no-await-in-loop.js
2.44 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
/**
* @fileoverview Rule to disallow uses of await inside of loops.
* @author Nat Mote (nmote)
*/
"use strict";
// Node types which are considered loops.
const loopTypes = new Set([
"ForStatement",
"ForOfStatement",
"ForInStatement",
"WhileStatement",
"DoWhileStatement"
]);
// Node types at which we should stop looking for loops. For example, it is fine to declare an async
// function within a loop, and use await inside of that.
const boundaryTypes = new Set([
"FunctionDeclaration",
"FunctionExpression",
"ArrowFunctionExpression"
]);
module.exports = {
meta: {
docs: {
description: "disallow `await` inside of loops",
category: "Possible Errors",
recommended: false
},
schema: []
},
create(context) {
return {
AwaitExpression(node) {
const ancestors = context.getAncestors();
// Reverse so that we can traverse from the deepest node upwards.
ancestors.reverse();
// Create a set of all the ancestors plus this node so that we can check
// if this use of await appears in the body of the loop as opposed to
// the right-hand side of a for...of, for example.
const ancestorSet = new Set(ancestors).add(node);
for (let i = 0; i < ancestors.length; i++) {
const ancestor = ancestors[i];
if (boundaryTypes.has(ancestor.type)) {
// Short-circuit out if we encounter a boundary type. Loops above
// this do not matter.
return;
}
if (loopTypes.has(ancestor.type)) {
// Only report if we are actually in the body or another part that gets executed on
// every iteration.
if (
ancestorSet.has(ancestor.body) ||
ancestorSet.has(ancestor.test) ||
ancestorSet.has(ancestor.update)
) {
context.report({
node,
message: "Unexpected `await` inside a loop."
});
return;
}
}
}
}
};
}
};